Buckle up: CFPB bringing again regulation by enforcement


The Client Monetary Safety Bureau is making a comeback. The CFPB, which oversees monetary establishments with a eager give attention to shopper safety and making certain monetary markets are honest and equitable, was a diminished drive through the Trump administration. Massive monetary establishments loved each fewer enforcement actions and decrease civil cash penalties.

Now, nicely into the second hundred days of the Biden administration, the tide is popping, pushed partly by heightened recognition of the disparate monetary impacts of the pandemic, and a nationwide consciousness raised by the racial justice motion. This sea change may have important implications for any financial institution searching for to strategy buyer, group and regulatory relations holistically, and particularly for bigger banks, that are extra doubtless to attract shut regulatory scrutiny.

All massive banks, particularly, ought to put together for the return of “supervision by enforcement,” the philosophy that prevailed within the years following the monetary disaster, out of which the CFPB was born. President Biden’s nominee to steer the CFPB, Federal Commerce Fee member Rohit Chopra, was the bureau’s first scholar mortgage ombudsman beneath former CFPB Director Richard Cordray and is anticipated to return the bureau to its former place on the forefront of shopper safety in monetary providers.

Beneath Chopra, advanced monetary establishments with massive shopper portfolios that had important forbearance actions throughout COVID-19 and beneath the CARES Act are prone to be precedence targets. Chopra’s Senate affirmation was not too long ago delayed (once more), however he’s anticipated to be confirmed earlier than the Senate’s August recess. Within the meantime, appearing CFPB Director David Uejio is taking his personal steps to strengthen enforcement actions.

Amongst different shifts, the CFPB has signaled it can search to use honest lending/honest banking ideas, such because the disparate impression idea of legal responsibility, to nontraditional (non-origination) actions. Notably, this can doubtless embody the mortgage servicing actions of establishments with massive mortgage, auto and shopper portfolios. The disparate impression idea of legal responsibility permits the federal government to determine discrimination primarily based on the end result of banking insurance policies that appear impartial on their face.

The company is already enhancing its bench of enforcement attorneys, and anecdotal experiences counsel it has begun to quote extra “issues requiring consideration,” with larger civil cash penalties than was frequent within the final administration. Beneath the management of Uejio, the bureau has already initiated a number of attention-grabbing enforcement actions, with a heavy give attention to debt assortment and different actions seemingly exacerbated by COVID-19 and its financial aftermath.

As up to now, the bureau will leverage media consideration to maximise strain on massive monetary establishments it finds in violation of shopper safety legal guidelines and rules, and can doubtless take elevated numbers of enforcement actions collectively with the Division of Justice, Division of Housing and City Improvement and different federal companies.

In his testimony earlier than the Senate Banking Committee, and in different boards, Commissioner Chopra has stated he’ll give attention to the next areas of banking particularly:

  • Auto Lending, together with each direct and oblique financing of latest and used automobile purchases; the usage of large information and different information sources in underwriting; defaults and repossessions; and, doubtlessly, revising current CFPB steering regarding compliance with the Equal Credit score Alternative Act in oblique auto lending.
  • Honest Lending/Honest Banking/Honest Remedy, together with utility of ECOA and its implementing Regulation B, to discretionary underwriting, pricing and steering; utility of disparate impression requirements to mortgage lending and servicing, particularly within the context of CARES Act loss mitigation and forbearance actions; use of synthetic intelligence, different information and machine studying in credit score decisioning and different monetary fashions; statistical evaluation of servicing choices; evaluation of on-line/digital advertising methods; and potential utility of honest lending ideas to fraud and dispute administration.
  • Unfair and Misleading Acts and Practices, together with the CFPB’s revised steering on its “abusive” normal.
  • Honest Credit score Reporting Act, together with precedence assessments of credit score reporting companies and furnishers, inaccurate reporting of lodging, and failing to conduct “cheap investigation” of disputes throughout Covid-19.
  • Army Lending Act and Servicemembers Civil Reduction Act enforcement, and heightened consideration to safety of veterans’ rights extra typically.
  • Mortgage Lending, together with mortgage origination, servicing and default administration, loss mitigation, forbearance, modification, extension, refinance and foreclosures actions; safety of debtors with restricted English proficiency.
  • Ancillary/Add-on Merchandise (assured asset safety, prolonged guarantee applications, and numerous types of credit score insurance coverage) together with evaluation of product utility and alignment between product worth and prices to customers and potential enforcement exercise just like that which adopted the CARD Act of 2009.
  • Client Complaints, together with disputes pertaining to mortgage servicing, debt assortment, and credit score reporting; anomalous incidents resulting in shopper hurt; rising traits suggestive of systemic points; and growth of a complete, documented course of for investigating, figuring out, documenting, and remediating root causes of shopper complaints.

The rising regulatory surroundings will current the chance to redouble commitments to enhancing range and inclusion and addressing systemic racism and inequality. It is going to additionally current the problem of demonstrating this dedication to regulators by way of concrete outcomes.

Any financial institution that engages within the actions listed above ought to begin pondering now a few complete strategy to CFPB readiness to be able to proactively determine potential dangers of noncompliance with shopper safety legal guidelines and rules and take applicable corrective actions. This could embody a steady evaluation of real-time shopper criticism information to extra proactively determine potential deficiencies in shopper protections, and a modernization of how bankers strategy threat administration, doubtlessly encompassing operational areas by no means earlier than subjected to intense regulatory scrutiny.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here